European businesses urged implement anti-cyber security systems
The European Cyber Security Directive, which proposes that European businesses have a legal obligation to ensure they have suitable IT security mechanisms in place, is soon to be enforced in the UK.
Cybercrime, cyber activism and cyber espionage have dominated headlines for the past several years.
The recent drama surrounding the Edward Snowdon revelations coupled with the need to prepare for cyber terrorism and cyber war, have spurred the European Union to create the European Cyber Security Directive.
Just in the UK alone this year there were 50 million cyber-attacks, a number that is set to grow.
While the need for this directive has never been clearer, the directive itself has caused some confusion among enterprises.
Research undertaken by The Ponemon Institute, backs up widespread concerns, that many organisations will not be ready for the Directive in time.
The study found that only 58 per cent of businesses currently identify security threats and 28 per cent do not have a formal risk management strategy applied consistently across their entire enterprise.
Such low figures show that a large number of businesses have a lot of work to do by the 2015 deadline.
There are two key requirements for businesses mandated in this Directive that they need to consider.
Adopted in July of this year, the Directive aims to create a set minimum level of preparedness for cyber-attacks at the national level. It will include an online platform to prevent and counter cross-border cyber-attacks, as well as implement an incident reporting strategy.
Organisations will have to circulate early warnings of possible security risks – as soon as they are aware of them. The requirement to report breaches will help other companies avoid and learn from them, improving privacy and security universally.
In addition to requirements around breach notifications, the Directive introduces penalties for companies that do not comply with minimum security standards or do not take the steps necessary to improve their defences.
If an enterprise suffers a breach because it did not have sufficient IT security in place, the enterprise could receive a fine totalling up to 2 per cent of their annual global turnover.
This is a hugely significant mandate for businesses around the world, as it applies to any which operate in the EU, even if it’s headquartered elsewhere.
The EU has recognised that the Directive may be too big a burden for smaller businesses to bear so has excluded those that have less than 10 employees and those producing 2 million euros or less a year in profit.
Whilst this is welcome news for them, it still leaves a huge number of larger businesses at risk of failing to comply with the regulations.
Public authorities, information society service providers, those that operate critical infrastructure as well as health sector organisations and banking are groups that could be particularly affected.
Businesses have two years to comply with the Directive, and organisations are being urged to use this timeline as an opportunity to strengthen their security systems as much as possible.
It’s already clear, however, that even with this generous timeframe; some of the world’s biggest businesses will not be prepared to meet the criteria set by their own governments.
Despite Prime Minister David Cameron’s attempts to cut EU ‘red tape’, organisations in the UK will not be exempt and could face hefty fiscal penalties.
As we move closer to the compliance deadline, it will be interesting to see how companies of all sizes go about meeting these requirements.
Jonathan brings a wealth of business and technology expertise to Veracode. He previously served as VP EMEA for Arcot, helping to deliver the successful acquisition of the company by CA Technologies in 2010. Prior to this, he spent five years with IBM Software Group, leading development of the company’s security software propositions in the UK.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Information Daily, its parent company or any associated businesses.
Login/Register to Post Comment
Public sector commitment to "open data" is patchy despite a raft of fine sounding policy statements. The "D" word…
The public sector market in the English north and midlands differs from that in the south and east. Suppliers…
The new procurement framework for Commissioning Support Units (CSUs) will not allay CCG concerns over commissioning…
Neighbourhood planning, a measure brought in by the Localism Act to devolve power to local communities, may not…
Broadcast TV viewing is down 4% but only three percent of 16-24 yr olds give a damn, too busy risking obesity…
HealthCare Innovation Daily (an Information Daily channel) is supporting Science Capital in presenting their Innovative…
Do you do digital? Take the test
Headline results so far: Results from 104 users
MPs and campaigners want suppliers to be covered by Freedom of Information law, with the Cabinet Office considering…
"Most media outlets," including some stellar Fleet Street titles, have been ticked off by NHS Choices for getting…
Good, collaborative relationships and whole system sign up are key to effective health and care integration, improved…