Smoking Health Warning

Tobacco industry funded research shunned by some health publishers

By: Information Daily Staff Writer
Published: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 - 22:30 GMT Jump to Comments

Health editors from the BMJ, Heart, Thorax and BMJ Open say they will not consider the publication of studies that have been funded in part or wholly by the tobacco industry.

The editors state that their new policy is consistent with that of other journals, and it aims to show that they are committed to publishing work that only improves knowledge of health and disease without any links to a product with a detrimental effect on health.

Critics could argue that the publishing of research funded by these companies does not equal endorsement, but the editors believe that this view “ignores the growing body of evidence that biases and research misconduct are often impossible to detect".

It has been argued that instead of improving knowledge, the tobacco industry “has used research to deliberately produce ignorance and to advance its ultimate goal of selling its deadly products while shoring up its damaged legitimacy”.

There is extensive research which draws on the tobacco industry’s own documents, which reveal how the industry aimed to create scientific and popular ignorance or “doubt” for decades surrounding research into smoking and lung cancer and the effects of passive smoking on health.

Some editors acknowledged that journals “unwittingly played a role in producing and sustaining this ignorance”. Yet some believe that new tobacco products could represent potential public health gains. Tobacco company sponsored research may be the first to identify such gains.

Despite this, it has been argued that these companies are always in the business of marketing and selling cigarettes, and no ‘healthier’ alternative can overcome this fact.

Editors go on to argue that “the tobacco industry has not changed in any fundamental way, and the cigarette, the single most deadly consumer product ever made, remains widely available and aggressively marketed”.

Back in 2003, the BMJ editor defended their publication of a study funded by the tobacco industry by stating that “the BMJ is passionately anti-tobacco, but we are also passionately pro-debate and pro-science. A ban would be anti-science”.

The editorial concludes that a refusal to publish tobacco industry funded research “affirms our fundamental commitment not to allow our journals to be used in the service of an industry that continues to perpetuate the most deadly disease epidemic of our times”.

Comments

Latest

Friendly, accessible, impartial information and data is a vital part of support for deafblind people and those…

Leighton Andrews rejects voluntary merger plans from Blaenau Gwent and Torfaen, Bridgend and the Vale of Glamorgan,…

Blackpool, St Ives, Scarborough, Brighton, Whitley Bay and Lincolnshire among seaside areas to get share of the…

Heathrow expansion will exacerbate rather than mitigate regional imbalances, By drawing more business into the…

Councils in England have increasing responsibility and influence over health and social care. They will need to…

The next InformationDaily.TV AnswerTime® recording 4 Feb and free to view on 8th unpicks the personal data…

Two neighbouring London boroughs plan to share services and staff with each hoping to save up to £10m a year…

2015 will be the year of the Internet of Things. Understanding data ownership is essential. The Midata scheme…

The world is changing! It has changed so much over the past two decades we can no longer expect a job for life,…

Liverpool looks for technology firms after ending BT contract, as North East Lincolnshire considers sacking Serco…

George Osborne backs Solihull taking time over decision on Birmingham and Black Country combined authority, as…

Giving combined authorities in England the ability to run their local NHSs would make healthcare more responsive…